← Ablatotech Vitals
Anesthesiology EvidenceDigest

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Anesthesia: Current Evidence and Best Practices

Anesthesiology · EvidenceDigest

Reviewed by the Ablatotech Vitals editorial team
September 29, 2026 · Reviewer: Vitals Editorial Team
Educational use only. This digest is AI-curated commentary reviewed by clinicians. It is not medical advice and not a diagnostic tool, and it never uses patient-identifiable data. Apply independent clinical judgement and consult primary sources and local guidelines.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols represent a multidisciplinary, evidence-based approach to perioperative care that improves patient outcomes by reducing complications, shortening hospital stays, and accelerating functional recovery. Anesthesia plays a pivotal role within ERAS pathways, focusing on multimodal analgesia, opioid-sparing techniques, and optimized fluid management. Current guidelines emphasize tailoring anesthetic strategies to specific surgical populations, with regional anesthesia and goal-directed therapy as key components. Despite robust evidence supporting ERAS benefits, implementation variability and patient heterogeneity require ongoing refinement and individualized application (Batchelor et al., 2019; Cukierman et al., 2023; Venkat Sai Sashanka Kotipalli et al., 2023).

Clinical bottom line

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols represent a multidisciplinary, evidence-based approach to perioperative care that improves patient outcomes by reducing complications, shortening hospital stays, and accelerating functional recovery. Anesthesia plays a pivotal role within ERAS pathways, focusing on multimodal analgesia, opioid-sparing techniques, and optimized fluid management. Current guidelines emphasize tailoring anesthetic strategies to specific surgical populations, with regional anesthesia and goal-directed therapy as key components. Despite robust evidence supporting ERAS benefits, implementation variability and patient heterogeneity require ongoing refinement and individualized application (Batchelor et al., 2019; Cukierman et al., 2023; Venkat Sai Sashanka Kotipalli et al., 2023).

What the evidence shows

Batchelor et al. (2019) provide comprehensive ERAS guidelines for lung surgery, underscoring anesthesia’s role in minimizing opioid use, facilitating early extubation, and promoting pulmonary function. Their recommendations include preoperative education, intraoperative lung-protective ventilation, and multimodal analgesia incorporating regional blocks.

Cukierman et al. (2023) review ERAS protocols in ambulatory surgery, highlighting the importance of anesthetic techniques that enable rapid recovery and discharge, such as short-acting agents and effective nausea prevention.

Venkat Sai Sashanka Kotipalli et al. (2023) critically analyze anesthesia’s contribution to ERAS, emphasizing opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia, regional anesthesia, and hemodynamic optimization as cornerstones for enhancing recovery.

Albisinni et al. (2025) discuss ERAS implementation in radical cystectomy, noting that anesthetic management tailored to reduce stress response and improve pain control correlates with decreased morbidity.

Mancel et al. (2021) focus on regional anesthesia’s role within ERAS, demonstrating its benefits in reducing opioid consumption, improving pain scores, and facilitating early mobilization across various surgical specialties.

Ullah et al. (2026) summarize current evidence in general surgery ERAS protocols, reinforcing that anesthetic components such as goal-directed fluid therapy and avoidance of excessive sedation improve postoperative outcomes.

Caveats and uncertainty

Heterogeneity in ERAS protocol components and adherence complicates direct comparison of outcomes across studies.

Patient factors such as comorbidities and surgical complexity influence ERAS efficacy and anesthetic choices.

Limited high-quality data exist for ERAS protocols in certain surgical populations, including neonates and complex cases.

Optimal combinations and timing of anesthetic interventions within ERAS remain areas of active investigation.

Resource availability and institutional culture impact ERAS adoption and sustainability.

How this may change practice

Anesthesiologists should actively engage in ERAS pathway development and implementation, advocating for multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia and individualized fluid management.

Incorporation of regional anesthesia techniques should be prioritized where feasible to enhance recovery.

Preoperative patient education and optimization, including smoking cessation and nutrition, should be integrated into perioperative planning.

Continuous quality improvement initiatives and protocol adherence monitoring will improve ERAS outcomes.

Collaboration with surgical, nursing, and rehabilitation teams is essential to ensure comprehensive perioperative care.


References

  1. Batchelor TJP, et al. Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezy301
  2. Cukierman DS, et al. Enhanced recovery protocols for ambulatory surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2023; DOI:10.1016/j.bpa.2023.04.007
  3. Venkat Sai Sashanka Kotipalli, et al. The Role of Anesthesia in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols: A Critical Analysis. Int J Sci Res. 2023; DOI:10.21275/sr231217163249
  4. Albisinni S, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for patients undergoing radical cystectomy: Surgeons' perspectives and recommendations ten years after its implementation. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025; DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109543
  5. Mancel L, et al. Role of regional anesthesia in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2021; DOI:10.1097/aco.0000000000001048
  6. Ullah A, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in General Surgery: Current Evidence and Future Directions. 2026; DOI:10.2139/ssrn.7421618

© 2026 Ablatotech, Inc. All rights reserved. Reviewed by the Ablatotech Vitals editorial team