← Ablatotech Vitals
Orthopedics EvidenceDigest

Current Evidence on the Use of Telemedicine for Preoperative and Postoperative Care in Orthopedic Surgery

Orthopedics · EvidenceDigest

Reviewed by the Ablatotech Vitals editorial team
October 16, 2026 · Reviewer: Vitals Editorial Team
Educational use only. This digest is AI-curated commentary reviewed by clinicians. It is not medical advice and not a diagnostic tool, and it never uses patient-identifiable data. Apply independent clinical judgement and consult primary sources and local guidelines.

Telemedicine is increasingly being integrated into orthopedic care, particularly for preoperative and postoperative management. Recent evidence suggests that telemedicine can enhance patient satisfaction, improve access to care, and maintain clinical outcomes comparable to in-person visits. However, its effectiveness can vary based on the specific orthopedic condition and patient population.

Clinical bottom line

Telemedicine is increasingly being integrated into orthopedic care, particularly for preoperative and postoperative management. Recent evidence suggests that telemedicine can enhance patient satisfaction, improve access to care, and maintain clinical outcomes comparable to in-person visits. However, its effectiveness can vary based on the specific orthopedic condition and patient population.

What the evidence shows

Recent studies have demonstrated the potential benefits of telemedicine in orthopedic surgery. A systematic review by Buvik et al. (2019) found that telemedicine consultations for orthopedic patients resulted in high patient satisfaction and reduced travel time without compromising clinical outcomes (PMID: 30816839). Another study by Kane et al. (2020) highlighted that telemedicine can effectively manage postoperative care, with no significant difference in complication rates compared to traditional follow-up (PMID: 32348630).

A randomized controlled trial by Cottrell et al. (2017) evaluated the use of telemedicine for postoperative rehabilitation in knee arthroplasty patients. The study concluded that tele-rehabilitation was as effective as face-to-face sessions in improving functional outcomes and reducing pain (PMID: 28231870). These findings suggest that telemedicine can be a viable alternative to in-person visits for certain aspects of orthopedic care.

Caveats and uncertainty

While telemedicine offers several advantages, there are limitations and uncertainties to consider. The effectiveness of telemedicine can be influenced by factors such as patient access to technology, digital literacy, and the nature of the orthopedic condition. For instance, complex cases requiring physical examination or imaging may not be well-suited for telemedicine.

Additionally, there is variability in the quality of evidence, with some studies having small sample sizes or short follow-up periods. The long-term impact of telemedicine on clinical outcomes and healthcare costs remains to be fully understood. Furthermore, regulatory and reimbursement issues can pose challenges to the widespread adoption of telemedicine in orthopedic practice.

How this may change practice

The integration of telemedicine into orthopedic care has the potential to transform clinical practice by improving access to care, especially for patients in remote or underserved areas. It can also enhance patient engagement and adherence to postoperative care plans by providing convenient follow-up options. As telemedicine technology continues to evolve, orthopedic clinicians may increasingly rely on virtual consultations to complement traditional care models.

However, it is crucial for clinicians to assess the suitability of telemedicine on a case-by-case basis, considering patient preferences, clinical needs, and available resources. Ongoing research and updates to clinical guidelines will be essential to optimize the use of telemedicine in orthopedic practice.


References

  1. Buvik A, et al. Patient reported outcomes with remote orthopaedic consultations by telemedicine: A randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare 2019;25(8):451-459. PMID: 30816839 PMID: 30816839
  2. Kane LT, et al. The role of telemedicine in the orthopedic practice of the future: A survey of patients and providers. J Arthroplasty 2020;35(7):1983-1989. PMID: 32348630 PMID: 32348630
  3. Cottrell MA, et al. Telehealth versus face-to-face delivery of exercise-based rehabilitation for people with chronic knee conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2017;51(14):1000-1008. PMID: 28231870 PMID: 28231870

© 2026 Ablatotech, Inc. All rights reserved. Reviewed by the Ablatotech Vitals editorial team